EBLI-Spell-Better-Read-Better

Spell Better, Read Better

If you can spell a word (by sound, not memorization), you can read that word!

The reverse is not typically true.

Many competent to exceptional readers do not excel in spelling, but exceptional spellers almost always excel in reading.  Why is that?

Even though reading and spelling are ‘two sides of the same coin’, meaning they utilize the same code, learning to spell is much more challenging than learning to read.

Spell Better, Read Better

Think of a word that you can read easily and effortlessly (and know the meaning of) but struggle to spell. Some of those words for me: naïve, definitely, and phenomenal.

Reading is receptive and requires recognition, meaning the words are there for you to look at or ‘pick up’ off the page whether you are using memorization or are decoding the words.

Spelling is expressive and requires retrieval. You are looking at a blank page and must pull  correct spellings from your brain to put down on the blank page to spell the word. This is close to impossible to do from memorization and is even challenging when segmenting the word and matching the letter(s) to each sound.

Here is an example: If you are wishing to spell the word ‘chaos’, you aren’t looking at it. You must retrieve information about what spellings represent each of the sounds. For example, the sound /k/ is spelled with ‘ch’ as opposed to ‘c’ or ‘k’. For the /ai/ sound, you must retrieve the letter ‘a’. There are many other potential options for spelling this sound such as ai, ea, ei, e, or eigh.

Learning to spell is a lifelong endeavor. No one, including the Scripps Spelling Bee participants, knows how to spell all the words! All of us can become highly proficient, if not perfect, spellers. Spelling is a progression and almost always lags behind reading, regardless of one’s literacy prowess. However, those who have struggled with reading typically struggle even more with spelling. Their spelling will take even longer to remediate.

K Student, Fall

EBLI-Spell-Better-K-Student-Fall

K Student, Spring

EBLI-Spell-Better-K-Student-Spring

Back in the 1990’s, my subliterate daughter could spell all the words correctly on a spelling test. However, she would misspell the exact same words in her writing, sometimes even the same day as the test. What is that about? She had an exceptional visual memory and used rote memory to memorize the string of letters for the words. This is much like we used to do in the pre-cell phone days where we had to memorize a phone number. We would dial the number, talk to the person, and forget what that number was. Colleen, like many students, memorized those letter strings for the purpose of the spelling test then promptly forgot it.

If students show mastery of spelling for an assessment but can’t transfer that information to everyday, authentic writing, then they haven’t mastered the spelling. They have been given a fish as opposed to having learned how to fish.

With spelling, we want children to learn a process so that they can transfer what they have learned to correctly spell a wide range of words in any situation requiring writing or spelling.

How do we do this? All of the information shared below will be expanded on with examples in the companion Spell Better, Read Better free EBLI webinar.

Accurate spelling requires knowledge of the sound, not the letter name. The same is true for reading when instruction leads with the sounds in the word vs the names of the letters in the word.

Here are some challenges that occur when using letter names vs sound to teach spelling:

  1. Every consonant letter name is at least 2 sounds long.
    1. b= /b/ /ee/
    2. r= /ah/ /r/
    3. w = /d/ /u/ /b/ /l/ /y/ /oo/
    4. y= /w/ /igh/
  2. Using letter names instead of sounds to spell results in frequent misspellings.
    1. fr (far)
    2. dcv (deceive)
    3. obdnc (obedience)
  3. Words are made up of sounds, not letter names.
    1. Letter names are good to know but sounds are more important for reading and spelling.
    2. Speaking (using sounds pushed together to create words) is natural
    3. Letter names are man-made

With EBLI, we teach sounds for reading and spelling as opposed to letter names. When it comes to literacy, the letter names are like our middle names. It is good to know them when needed but they are not the ‘main event’ or the most necessary information to best get the job of reading and spelling done.

As with any instruction, it is important that students learn, practice, and apply the correct way to spell words. If children – or adults – practice doing something incorrectly then these mistakes become automatic and embedded. After extensive practice at misspelling, it is more difficult to remediate their inaccurate practices. This is especially true with spelling as so many learners have practiced spelling wrong for so long it becomes their norm. Any of us who have tried to diet or make lifestyle changes know firsthand how challenging it is to change a habit that is deeply ingrained.

It is critical to provide students with correct spellings in words and have THEM write the correction (not just see the correction) so the last thing imprinted on their brain is the accurate spelling. Of course, students can write a sloppy copy that will include inaccurate spellings of words. Emerging readers and writers will need more support and corrections at first. Dictated writing with immediate corrections is an effective bridge to gradually guiding students to independent writing.  

Our job is to provide them with the correct spellings and writing conventions and then have them rewrite their piece. When I write a blog or anything I will publish, I edit after receiving feedback and corrections from my team. This is the process book publishers use before the book is finalized and sold to the public. It is the process that should be used with our students when they write too.

When we let inventive spellings sit in the student’s brain without providing correction and rewriting, then students get to be very good at inventive spelling. The spelling system was invented a few centuries ago by hundreds of scholars so that we would have acceptable ways of spelling that we all use so we can read what others write and communicate effectively.

The English alphabetic code was invented so that our talk could be written down. It got a bit messy when the spellings from several languages were used to represent the sounds but, when we understand the logic of the system and teach that logic to our students, it is an elegant, excellent, interesting system for reading and spelling.

The sounds in each word we say are represented with letter(s). It is that simple! Some of the spellings are quite interesting. If you look at the word suite, the ‘u’ represents /w/. How wild is that?!

Because our speech sounds are represented by 1-4 letters, all words can be broken into sounds and all sounds are represented by letters. With spelling, you also want to address morphology to bolster students for both meaning and spelling. For example, the word magician ends in ‘cian’, which denotes a person. This /sh/ /u/ /n/ spelling (ci a n) is different than the different spellings for the same /sh/ /u/ /n/ sounds in lotion (ti o n), mission (ssi o n), pension (si o n), and fashion (shi o n). The root word ‘magic’ in magician gives another clue to the meaning and spelling of the word.

What is the very best way to improve spelling, especially in children and adults who have misspelled words pervasively for years? It takes work.  Progressing toward accurate and automatic spelling is going to take much more time than achieving accurate and automatic reading.

Explicit instruction in the alphabetic principal is the first step. Match the sounds we say in words with the letter(s) that spell them. Next, apply what was learned with support and correction, moving to independence. Like with reading, explicit instruction and moving quickly to intrinsic learning with application all along the way is key. This means isolated, siloed instruction with spelling lists or drills is not the ideal path. Utilizing what was learned by applying it in reading and writing makes the process meaningful and relevant to students, thus more ‘sticky’ in the brain.

If you are interested in helping improve spelling for learners, this EBLI Spelling Mini-Course provides instruction and resources for you to improve student spelling in the manner discussed in this blog.

2nd Grade - October 2023

EBLI-2nd-Grade-Oct-2023

2nd Grade - May 2024

EBLI-2nd-Grade-May-2024

Below are my two favorite books that discuss spelling and research on spelling. They are both by Dr. Diane McGuinness, written 6 years apart. One of the many exceptional traits about both is the quality and quantity of references provided. There are hundreds of references in each book. Virtually everything she writes in these books is backed up by citations to research!

Dr. Diane McGuinness Recommended Reading:

Why Our Children Can’t Read and What We Can Do About It 

Early Reading Instruction: What Science Really Tells Us About How to Teach Reading

As always, the best outcome for learners should be the focus of our instruction and discussions! How do we most effectively and efficiently teach and remediate spelling so that the information transfers to spelling in writing? If our students are not proficient spellers, our job with teaching them is to keep learning ourselves and shifting our instructional practices until they are.

Stephane Bolton has spent more than two decades teaching first graders to read. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, a Master’s degree, and an Education Specialist degree — all from the University of North Alabama. In 2011, she received National Board Certification and renewed it in 2020. She has served as an instructional coach and an assistant principal. By any measure, Stephane was already an accomplished literacy educator.

But she wasn’t reaching every student.

Bolton had trained extensively in phonics instruction over the years — first through the Alabama Reading Initiative, then through LETRS and Orton-Gillingham. Each step forward clarified the picture. As she told journalist Holly Korbey in The Bell Ringer, the Science of Reading training helped her see the puzzle pieces more clearly, and things began to make more sense. But a handful of students continued to struggle, year after year.

Then she discovered EBLI.

The Shift

Bolton found EBLI through the Accelerate Literacy Summit — almost by accident. What caught her attention was how the method streamlined phonics instruction: fewer rules for students to memorize, a lighter cognitive load, and a focus on students picking up sound-letter patterns in words and applying them to reading and writing. It was a fundamentally different approach — Linguistic Phonics, rooted in the speech-to-print methodology that starts with what students already know (spoken language) and maps it to print.

She paid for the training herself.

The Results

What happened next in Stephane’s first-grade classroom during her first year teaching EBLI was remarkable.

2024–2025 School Year (Bolton’s First Year Using EBLI):

Beginning of year (August 2024): 

  • 37% of her class was at grade level on the iReady assessment.
  • The average wpm (words per minute) on DIBELS for the 19 students was 46.9.
  • The average accuracy on DIBELS for the class was 84.9%


End of year (May 2025):

  • 100% of her students were reading at or above grade level on iReady (+63%)
  • Median of 184% of typical growth for iReady
    • The average DIBELS wpm for the class was 108.2 (+58.6wpm)
      • EOY Benchmark for 1st grade is 91 wpm
    • The average accuracy was 98.1% (+13.2%)
      • EOY 1st grade benchmark for accuracy is 91%.
  • Every student was independently reading chapter books by year’s end.

DIBELS Results 8th Edition – Correct Words Per Minute and Percent Accuracy

In Her Own Words

In September 2025, Bolton shared this reflection on her experience with EBLI:

"EBLI has completely transformed the way I teach and the way my students learn. During my first year using EBLI, every child in my class experienced remarkable growth. Struggling readers made leaps that once felt out of reach, while fluent readers progressed far beyond grade-level expectations. One thing that makes EBLI so powerful is its seamless integration of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, handwriting, writing, and spelling. These skills aren't taught in isolation. Instead, they are woven together in every EBLI activity, giving students constant practice with high-leverage skills. Built on cognitive science, EBLI instruction feels clear and efficient. It reduces the cognitive load for both students and teachers so we can focus on what truly matters. In my classroom, EBLI is everywhere! Reading and writing flow naturally through every subject, and the activities are so engaging that students often beg to do them as rewards. I've watched my first graders grow into resilient, flexible thinkers who genuinely love learning and reading! EBLI has given me more than a method…it has given me a mission! My passion to join EBLI in 'teaching the world to read' now stretches beyond my classroom of students. I've started tutoring during planning times at school and even opened a private practice over the summer to reach more learners. Teaching with EBLI doesn't just feel like instruction; it feels like a calling, because every person deserves the richness of a literate life."
Stephane Bolton
First Grade Teacher, Kilby Laboratory School

Who Is Stephane Bolton?

Stephane is the first-grade supervising teacher at Kilby Laboratory School, a public laboratory school on the campus of the University of North Alabama in Florence, Alabama. Kilby is ranked among the top 5% of elementary schools in Alabama for overall test scores, with 80–84% of students achieving reading proficiency — compared to the state average of 47%.

Accomplishments: 

Two articles about her EBLI experience published in peer-reviewed journals: 

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Founded Primary Patchwork Learning Center, 2025

  • Stephane teaches EBLI privately to students after school, on weekends, and during the summer.

Goyen Literacy Fellow, 2025

Presenter (by request), Alabama Literacy Association conference, Fall, 2025

  • Follow the Yellow Brick Road: A Speech-to-Print Journey to Stronger Literacy

Featured Holly Korbey’s “The Phonics Wars” article, February 2026

Why This Matters

Bolton’s story matters because she is not a newcomer. She had decades of training in teaching reading, Science of Reading frameworks, and evidence-based practices before she found EBLI. She had already been doing the work. And yet, it was the shift to Linguistic Phonics — the speech-first, streamlined approach that EBLI uses — that closed the gap for the students she hadn’t been able to reach before.

Her experience mirrors what EBLI’s independent research has shown across larger studies: in a Michigan study of 815 students across 35 classrooms, 58% of K–4 students met fall-to-fall growth expectations with EBLI, compared to 42% in the pre-EBLI cohort. In a Massachusetts intervention study, 37% of students reached grade level and 88% passed the state assessment. And in Grand Rapids, the percentage of students at or above grade level rose from 40% to 70%.

Bolton’s classroom data adds a powerful individual case to this growing body of evidence — one teacher, one classroom, and the outcome every educator hopes for: every student reading.

Want to learn more about EBLI training? Explore Training Options 

See the full research behind EBLI: View Evidence

 
  • Bolton, S., Tomlinson, A., Kirkman, E. (2025) Elevating Literacy Through Evidence-Based Practice: A Case Study in Innovation at Kilby Laborators School, IALS Journal. Read the Journal. 
  • Bolton, S. (2025) Teaching with Clarity: The Power of Speech-to-Print Instruction, The Reading Paradigm (2025). Read the article
  • Bolton, S. (2025). Teaching less and learning more: Five shifts that maximized growth. Science of Reading Classroom. Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “A Closer Look at EBLI: Bringing the Five Shifts to Life.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “Fluency in 1st Grade: An Introduction.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Korbey, H. (2026). “The Phonics Wars.” The Bell Ringer (Substack). Read the article
  • EBLI Facebook page, sharing Bolton’s data from the 2024–2025 school year
  • Goyen Literacy Fellowship. Goyen Foundation. Learn more
  • ESSA Research on EBLI, independent efficacy studies. See results

Share this post

Recent Blogs

×