EBLI-Speech-to-Print-Benefits

The Benefits of Speech to Print vs Print to Speech

Reading is a fundamental skill that opens doors to knowledge, imagination, and success. However, teaching children to read effectively has been debated and researched for decades. Among the various methodologies that have emerged, including balanced literacy, traditional phonics or a Print-to-Speech approach, and Structured Linguistic Literacy (SLL) or a Speech-to-Print approach, educators and private practitioners are discovering that a Speech-to-Print instructional approach stands out as particularly efficient and effective. This article covers the benefits of Structured Linguistic Literacy methodology, examining its principles, benefits, and how it compares to traditional reading instruction techniques.

What is Speech-to-Print?

Speech-to-Print methodology, also known as Structured Linguistic Literacy (SLL) or Linguistic Phonics (LP), is a systematic and explicit approach to teaching reading and writing. Unlike traditional methods that begin with letters and their sounds, Speech to Print starts with the spoken language – the sounds from the words we speak- and then matches the spellings (graphemes) to the sounds (phonemes). 

The core principle of Structured Linguistic Literacy is that spoken language is the foundation of written language as opposed to the other way around. This approach recognizes that children come to school with a well-developed ability to use spoken language and brains that naturally recognize patterns, and it leverages these strengths to teach reading and writing.

Speech-to-Print approaches provide explicit instruction in the concepts that are the foundational basis of the English alphabetic code, which circumvents the need to teach students an excessive amount of the code. Once students have a firm understanding of how the code functions, they can transition more quickly to implicit learning or self-teaching. This important distinction accelerates the acquisition of accurate, automatic reading and writing. 

Key Principles of Speech-to-Print/Structured Linguistic Literacy:

  1. Sound-First Approach: Instruction begins with identifying and manipulating the sounds (phonemes) in spoken words before introducing their written representations.
  2. Integrated Skills: Reading, writing, and spelling are taught simultaneously, reinforcing each other.
  3. Pattern Recognition: Instead of teaching rigid rules, students learn flexible spelling patterns that can be applied to many words.
  4. Contextual Learning: Sounds are taught in the context of words, not in isolation.
  5. Orthographic Mapping: From the outset, students learn to connect the sounds in words (phonemes) to their spellings (graphemes), facilitating automatic word recognition.

The Science Behind Speech-to-Print

The effectiveness of Speech-to-Print is rooted in cognitive science and research on how the brain processes language. Dr. Mark Seidenberg, a cognitive scientist and expert in the Science of Reading, has contributed significantly to our understanding of the reading process.

Seidenberg’s research emphasizes the importance of phonological awareness and the ability to map sounds to letters in learning to read. He describes a phenomenon he calls “escape velocity,” where students transition from explicit instruction to self-teaching. Speech to Print methodology aims to achieve this transition efficiently.

The process works as follows:

  1. Students are explicitly taught how the English alphabetic code works.
  2. They learn to apply these concepts to all words.
  3. As their skills develop, they require less support and can increasingly teach themselves new words.

This approach aligns with what cognitive scientists call the “Simple View of Reading,” which posits that reading comprehension is the product of decoding ability and language comprehension.

Speech-to-Print vs. Traditional Print-to-Speech Methods

To understand the benefits of Speech-to-Print or Structured Linguistic Literacy, it’s helpful to compare it to more traditional Print-to-Speech methods, often referred to as Structured Literacy. While both approaches have merits, they differ significantly in their methodology and outcomes.

 Speech-to PrintPrint-to-Speech
Starting PointSpoken sounds (phonemes)Letter names and sounds
Approach to WordsFlexible patternsRules and exceptions
High-
Frequency Words
Taught explicitly by sound, the same as with all wordsOften memorized, either the irregular graphemes
or as whole words
Multi-
syllable Words
Split based on pronunciationTaught using syllable types
Instruction SpeedAllows for accelerated learningOften requires mastery before moving on
Cognitive LoadGenerally lower, pattern recognition is applied in the context of words, with no need for rules or declarative knowledgeOften higher due to memorization of rules, syllable types, and declarative knowledge
HandwritingIntegrated into reading and spelling instructionTaught separately or not taught
Spelling InstructionIntegrated with readingOften taught separately
Intervention
Time
Average: 12-24 hoursAverage: 2-4 sessions/week for 2-4 years

Benefits of Speech-to-Print

The Speech to Print method offers several advantages:

  1. Efficiency: By starting with sounds students already know, the learning process is accelerated.
  2. Inclusivity: This method has shown significant success with all students, including those who struggle with traditional reading instruction and students diagnosed with dyslexia.
  3. Reduced Cognitive Load: By focusing on patterns rather than rules, students often find the process less mentally taxing.
  4. Integrated Skills: The simultaneous teaching of reading, writing, and spelling reinforces learning across all areas.
  5. Flexibility: Students learn to approach unfamiliar words with confidence, applying their knowledge of sound-spelling relationships.
  6. Rapid Progress: Many students advance quickly to reading a wide range of texts.

Benefits-of-Speech-to-Print-EBLI-Blog

Implementing Speech-to-Print in the Classroom

For educators interested in incorporating Speech to Print methods into their teaching, here are some practical strategies:

  1. Begin with Phonemic Awareness: Start lessons by identifying and manipulating sounds in spoken words. This can include activities like sound blending, segmenting, and substitution.
  2. Use Natural Speech: Teach words as they’re pronounced, allowing for flexibility and ease of instruction regardless of dialect. For example, the word “car” is three sounds, c /k/, a /o/, r /r/ in the US and c /k/ ar /o/ in Australia, New Zealand, and most parts of England.
  3. Integrate Skills: Combine reading, writing, and spelling instruction in each lesson. For instance, after identifying sounds in a spoken word, students write the word and then read it back.
  4. Teach Flexible Patterns: Instead of rigid rules, help students notice and apply spelling patterns flexibly. For example, the long /a/ sound can be spelled in multiple ways (a, ai, ay, ea, e, eigh, ey).
  5. Use Word Sorts: Have students sort words based on their sounds and spellings to reinforce pattern recognition.
  6. Progress Based on Student Readiness: Don’t hold students back if they’re ready to move on to more complex text. The Speech-to-Print method allows for accelerated learning.
  7. Incorporate Multisensory Activities: Students see, hear, say, and write at the same time, allowing for rapid integration of the code knowledge and transferring that information to additional words with the same graphemes, morphemes, and patterns.

Julie’s full story including student examples and results:

What I Didn’t Learn in College: A Kindergarten Teacher’s Story

Speech to Print: Challenges and Considerations 

While Speech to Print has shown impressive results, it’s important to note that implementing this method can come with challenges:

  1. Teacher Training: Educators may need additional training to effectively implement Speech-to-Print methods, as it differs significantly from traditional teaching approaches.
  2. Resource Adaptation: Existing teaching materials may need to be adapted or replaced to align with Structured Linguistic Literacy principles.
  3. Assessment Alignment: Standard reading assessments may not fully capture the progress of students learning through Speech-to-Print methods, particularly in the early stages.
  4. Parental Understanding: Parents accustomed to traditional methods may need education about the Speech-to-Print approach to support their children effectively.

The Future of Reading Instruction

As our understanding of the reading process continues to evolve, methods like Speech-to- Print are likely to play an increasingly important role in literacy education. The focus is shifting from debates about ideology to a more evidence-based approach that prioritizes student outcomes.

Key areas for future research and development include:

  1. Long-term studies on the effects of the Speech to Print approach
  2. Development of standardized assessments that align with Speech to Print methodologies
  3. Integration of Speech-to-Print principles with digital learning tools
  4. The impact of Speech-to-Print methodology on English language learners and exploring the need for inclusion of additional language and vocabulary in their instruction

Speech-to-Print: Effective, Efficient Reading Instruction

Speech-to-Print represents a significant advancement in reading instruction. By aligning teaching methods with how the brain processes language, it offers an efficient and effective path to literacy for many students, including those who struggle with traditional approaches.

As with any educational method, the key to success lies in thoughtful implementation, ongoing assessment, and a willingness to adapt based on student needs. SLL provides educators with a powerful tool to help students not just learn to read, but to become confident, skilled readers who enjoy the process of engaging with text.

By focusing on student outcomes and continually refining our instructional practices, we can move beyond historical debates about reading instruction and towards more effective teaching methods that serve all learners.

Join Us in Transforming Literacy Education 

Your commitment to improving literacy is commendable. By exploring innovative methods like Speech-to-Print, you’re taking a crucial step toward empowering learners of all abilities. Remember, every child you help to read is a life forever changed.

But why stop here? Dive deeper into the world of Speech-to-Print and elevate your teaching skills even further.

Ready to revolutionize your approach to reading instruction? 

Join us for EBLI’s exclusive, free webinar: Speech-to-Print vs Speech-to-Print

In this comprehensive session, you’ll learn:

  • What is speech-to-print phonics?
  • What is print-to-speech phonics?
  • How does speech-to-print differ from print-to-speech?
  • EBLI Founder answers to attendee’s questions

Don’t miss this opportunity to be at the forefront of literacy education. Together, we can unlock the power of reading for every learner. Click here to register now.

Picture of Nora Chahbazi, B.S.<br>Founder, EBLI Evidence-Based Literacy Instruction

Nora Chahbazi, B.S.
Founder, EBLI Evidence-Based Literacy Instruction

Nora has dedicated over 25 years to improving reading instruction. She founded EBLI: Evidence-Based Literacy Instruction and has trained thousands of educators worldwide, teaching learners of all ages and abilities.

She has spoken at numerous conferences, including Plain Talk for Literacy and The Reading League. Nora collaborates with schools as well as organizations focused on implementing research-based teaching practices to promote high-level literacy for all.

Nora served as the literacy consultant for the documentary The Truth About Reading and participated in discussions after screenings, including at the SXSW film festival. She is on the board of The Reading League Michigan.

Nora has appeared in various media, including Emily Hanford’s Sold a Story podcast, the PBS documentary Building the Reading Brain, and an interview on Oprah Radio with Maya Angelou.

She is committed to the mission of teaching the world to read.

Stephane Bolton has spent more than two decades teaching first graders to read. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, a Master’s degree, and an Education Specialist degree — all from the University of North Alabama. In 2011, she received National Board Certification and renewed it in 2020. She has served as an instructional coach and an assistant principal. By any measure, Stephane was already an accomplished literacy educator.

But she wasn’t reaching every student.

Bolton had trained extensively in phonics instruction over the years — first through the Alabama Reading Initiative, then through LETRS and Orton-Gillingham. Each step forward clarified the picture. As she told journalist Holly Korbey in The Bell Ringer, the Science of Reading training helped her see the puzzle pieces more clearly, and things began to make more sense. But a handful of students continued to struggle, year after year.

Then she discovered EBLI.

The Shift

Bolton found EBLI through the Accelerate Literacy Summit — almost by accident. What caught her attention was how the method streamlined phonics instruction: fewer rules for students to memorize, a lighter cognitive load, and a focus on students picking up sound-letter patterns in words and applying them to reading and writing. It was a fundamentally different approach — Linguistic Phonics, rooted in the speech-to-print methodology that starts with what students already know (spoken language) and maps it to print.

She paid for the training herself.

The Results

What happened next in Stephane’s first-grade classroom during her first year teaching EBLI was remarkable.

2024–2025 School Year (Bolton’s First Year Using EBLI):

Beginning of year (August 2024): 

  • 37% of her class was at grade level on the iReady assessment.
  • The average wpm (words per minute) on DIBELS for the 19 students was 46.9.
  • The average accuracy on DIBELS for the class was 84.9%


End of year (May 2025):

  • 100% of her students were reading at or above grade level on iReady (+63%)
  • Median of 184% of typical growth for iReady
    • The average DIBELS wpm for the class was 108.2 (+58.6wpm)
      • EOY Benchmark for 1st grade is 91 wpm
    • The average accuracy was 98.1% (+13.2%)
      • EOY 1st grade benchmark for accuracy is 91%.
  • Every student was independently reading chapter books by year’s end.

DIBELS Results 8th Edition – Correct Words Per Minute and Percent Accuracy

In Her Own Words

In September 2025, Bolton shared this reflection on her experience with EBLI:

"EBLI has completely transformed the way I teach and the way my students learn. During my first year using EBLI, every child in my class experienced remarkable growth. Struggling readers made leaps that once felt out of reach, while fluent readers progressed far beyond grade-level expectations. One thing that makes EBLI so powerful is its seamless integration of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, handwriting, writing, and spelling. These skills aren't taught in isolation. Instead, they are woven together in every EBLI activity, giving students constant practice with high-leverage skills. Built on cognitive science, EBLI instruction feels clear and efficient. It reduces the cognitive load for both students and teachers so we can focus on what truly matters. In my classroom, EBLI is everywhere! Reading and writing flow naturally through every subject, and the activities are so engaging that students often beg to do them as rewards. I've watched my first graders grow into resilient, flexible thinkers who genuinely love learning and reading! EBLI has given me more than a method…it has given me a mission! My passion to join EBLI in 'teaching the world to read' now stretches beyond my classroom of students. I've started tutoring during planning times at school and even opened a private practice over the summer to reach more learners. Teaching with EBLI doesn't just feel like instruction; it feels like a calling, because every person deserves the richness of a literate life."
Stephane Bolton
First Grade Teacher, Kilby Laboratory School

Who Is Stephane Bolton?

Stephane is the first-grade supervising teacher at Kilby Laboratory School, a public laboratory school on the campus of the University of North Alabama in Florence, Alabama. Kilby is ranked among the top 5% of elementary schools in Alabama for overall test scores, with 80–84% of students achieving reading proficiency — compared to the state average of 47%.

Accomplishments: 

Two articles about her EBLI experience published in peer-reviewed journals: 

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Founded Primary Patchwork Learning Center, 2025

  • Stephane teaches EBLI privately to students after school, on weekends, and during the summer.

Goyen Literacy Fellow, 2025

Presenter (by request), Alabama Literacy Association conference, Fall, 2025

  • Follow the Yellow Brick Road: A Speech-to-Print Journey to Stronger Literacy

Featured Holly Korbey’s “The Phonics Wars” article, February 2026

Why This Matters

Bolton’s story matters because she is not a newcomer. She had decades of training in teaching reading, Science of Reading frameworks, and evidence-based practices before she found EBLI. She had already been doing the work. And yet, it was the shift to Linguistic Phonics — the speech-first, streamlined approach that EBLI uses — that closed the gap for the students she hadn’t been able to reach before.

Her experience mirrors what EBLI’s independent research has shown across larger studies: in a Michigan study of 815 students across 35 classrooms, 58% of K–4 students met fall-to-fall growth expectations with EBLI, compared to 42% in the pre-EBLI cohort. In a Massachusetts intervention study, 37% of students reached grade level and 88% passed the state assessment. And in Grand Rapids, the percentage of students at or above grade level rose from 40% to 70%.

Bolton’s classroom data adds a powerful individual case to this growing body of evidence — one teacher, one classroom, and the outcome every educator hopes for: every student reading.

Want to learn more about EBLI training? Explore Training Options 

See the full research behind EBLI: View Evidence

 
  • Bolton, S., Tomlinson, A., Kirkman, E. (2025) Elevating Literacy Through Evidence-Based Practice: A Case Study in Innovation at Kilby Laborators School, IALS Journal. Read the Journal. 
  • Bolton, S. (2025) Teaching with Clarity: The Power of Speech-to-Print Instruction, The Reading Paradigm (2025). Read the article
  • Bolton, S. (2025). Teaching less and learning more: Five shifts that maximized growth. Science of Reading Classroom. Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “A Closer Look at EBLI: Bringing the Five Shifts to Life.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “Fluency in 1st Grade: An Introduction.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Korbey, H. (2026). “The Phonics Wars.” The Bell Ringer (Substack). Read the article
  • EBLI Facebook page, sharing Bolton’s data from the 2024–2025 school year
  • Goyen Literacy Fellowship. Goyen Foundation. Learn more
  • ESSA Research on EBLI, independent efficacy studies. See results

Share this post

Recent Blogs

1 Comment

Comments are closed.

×