What-Makes-EBLI-Unique

Components that Make EBLI Instruction Unique

What Makes EBLI Instruction Unique

When explaining EBLI to educators, administrators, and others, the most comment I get is “We already do that”.

Reflecting on their comments, I realize my weakness in conveying the unique, innovative qualities of EBLI that are hindering understanding. In collaborating with others who have created and/or teach a Structured Linguistic Literacy or Speech to Print approach, I’ve discovered that explaining why and how this approach is unique (without the opportunity to actually show instruction in action) is highly challenging for all of us! 

My intention for this blog and the companion webinar is to provide clarity on how EBLI is revolutionary and different from other approaches to teaching reading.

David Chalk, a successful but significantly sub-literate entrepreneur, allowed his EBLI instruction to be filmed for The Truth About Reading documentary. He had been taught with a variety of different methodologies over the decades that were not effective. Here is his excellent explanation of how learning to read with EBLI was different than everything else he’d been taught:

“When I learned that English was a code based on what I already knew, which was the words I speak, everything opened up for me. I can say a word and then say each of the sounds in the word. Then spelling each sound with the letter or letters that were the code for the sound, and having support with that, opened up everything from a logical standpoint. If I could put that code down with letters for the sounds I say to spell a word, then I could pick the words back up off the whiteboard or page by saying the sounds and putting them back together into a word. It was brilliant and really so simple when I used to think there was no rhyme nor reason to how to read or spell and I just had to do my best to memorize it all.”

Some ways EBLI instruction is unique:

  • Speech first for encoding and decoding
  • Integrated
  • Accelerated
  • Scaffolded
  • Comprehensive
  • Geared toward decreasing cognitive load
  • Incorporates explicit, systematic, foundational instruction in all areas of literacy:
    • The 5 Essential Components of Reading
      • Phonemic Awareness
      • Phonics
      • Vocabulary
      • Fluency
      • Comprehension
    • Handwriting
    • Spelling
    • Writing
  • Organized to facilitate immediate, supported application of what was taught/learned via
    • Reading in books and other connected text
    • Writing

Starting from what a child or learner of any age knows- the words that they are already able to speak – is integral for both reading and spelling instruction. Accessing the whole word that they say, segmenting the word into sounds, matching the letter(s) or spellings to the sounds as they write them, then saying the sounds and blending the word back together: this is at the core of EBLI instruction.  An emerging reader child or struggling older reader is buoyed and comforted by the realization that the words they speak are the impetus for learning to read or learning to read better. They already possess a fundamental piece of the learning to read process before instruction in the code even begins!

Active participation in instruction is engaging and multi-modal, with students seeing, saying, hearing, and writing during explicit instruction. Error correction is immediate and embedded into the activities taught, whether in whole class or intervention instruction. Instructional practices are intentional, with every step taught having a purpose. For example, ensuring students say the sounds as they write each spelling incorporates many essential components of reading, writing, and spelling. This practice also helps learners notice patterns as they occur in words and facilitates the orthographic mapping process. Educators can forgo teaching letter names and sounds in isolation, even with preschoolers, which simplifies instruction, accelerates learning, and frees up precious instructional time.

Teaching the code by words to sound and then matching the spelling avoids the need for instruction in phonics rules or syllable types. The amount of information needed and heavy cognitive load is dramatically decreased when teaching decoding with a Structured Linguistic Literacy system like EBLI. Leading with speech, instead of the letters or print, for both reading and spelling follows an approach that puts the focus on what is natural and automatic (speech) as opposed to what is man-made and awkward (print).

Leading with speech when reading is asking the learner to ‘pick up’ words off the page using the process they have been explicitly taught: English is a code and they will match sounds in words to the letters in print that represent them, with explicit instruction and support at first. They then become automatic at this process and use this process to accurately and automatically read and comprehend text. 

Integrated instruction with EBLI is critical to the ease of both teaching and learning. Every activity incorporates many components of literacy as opposed to teaching them in isolation or in ‘silos’. For example, EBLI’s Multi-Syllable Split Word Reading activity incorporates phonemic awareness with letters (segmenting, blending, phoneme substitution), phonics, vocabulary, and fluency as well as morphology instruction. It also includes cognitive training processes to strengthen memory, processing speed, sequencing, timing, rhythm, focus, and attention. Words that are learned in this activity are pulled from stories or texts that the students will then read, which improves both fluency and comprehension.

If a child is speaking multi-syllable words and has been taught the Structured Linguistic Literacy process through EBLI skills, concepts, and activities, then they will quickly be able to read and spell multi-syllable words. This is true even for the youngest emerging reader. 

Reading and spelling utilize the same code. A reader is picking up the code off the page and a speller uses the same code to put words down on a page. Spelling is much more challenging to learn as English is a complex code, with many spellings or graphemes used to spell the same sound and often the same grapheme or spelling represents different sounds. A firm knowledge of the alphabetic code and the concepts that make it complex is crucial in order to become an automatic, accurate reader and speller.

The human brain is a pattern seeking machine! Fortunately, the English alphabetic code is chock full of patterns. Because of this, when a learner is explicitly taught the concepts unique to English and learns how to apply it with instruction that incorporates the patterns, their brain learns the concepts quickly and easily. Not only that, they can then apply these concepts to code that they have not even been explicitly taught! Because of this, the process is what is most important, not the material (you’ll get examples of what I mean by this in the companion webinar). We don’t have to teach all or even the majority of the spellings for all the sounds or all the patterns. This initial direct, explicit instruction that is interleaved with spaced repetition and application, results in faster, further student progress with no need to put focus on mastery! Students will master the code, in reading and spelling, by applying the skills, concepts, and information through supported reading in text and writing.  This is another reason for the accelerated student progress with EBLI.

With reading, like with building a house or car, the end goal is to get it taught or built so it can be used for what it was intended for – to enjoy it! It is imperative to include all of the components in the teaching or building in the most efficient way to get the best possible outcome at the end.

With EBLI, the Speech to Print/Structured Linguistic Literacy approach or methodology used is intended to get students there as effectively and efficiently as possible and to provide teachers, private interventionists, and parents with what they need to get them there!

Stephane Bolton has spent more than two decades teaching first graders to read. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, a Master’s degree, and an Education Specialist degree — all from the University of North Alabama. In 2011, she received National Board Certification and renewed it in 2020. She has served as an instructional coach and an assistant principal. By any measure, Stephane was already an accomplished literacy educator.

But she wasn’t reaching every student.

Bolton had trained extensively in phonics instruction over the years — first through the Alabama Reading Initiative, then through LETRS and Orton-Gillingham. Each step forward clarified the picture. As she told journalist Holly Korbey in The Bell Ringer, the Science of Reading training helped her see the puzzle pieces more clearly, and things began to make more sense. But a handful of students continued to struggle, year after year.

Then she discovered EBLI.

The Shift

Bolton found EBLI through the Accelerate Literacy Summit — almost by accident. What caught her attention was how the method streamlined phonics instruction: fewer rules for students to memorize, a lighter cognitive load, and a focus on students picking up sound-letter patterns in words and applying them to reading and writing. It was a fundamentally different approach — Linguistic Phonics, rooted in the speech-to-print methodology that starts with what students already know (spoken language) and maps it to print.

She paid for the training herself.

The Results

What happened next in Stephane’s first-grade classroom during her first year teaching EBLI was remarkable.

2024–2025 School Year (Bolton’s First Year Using EBLI):

Beginning of year (August 2024): 

  • 37% of her class was at grade level on the iReady assessment.
  • The average wpm (words per minute) on DIBELS for the 19 students was 46.9.
  • The average accuracy on DIBELS for the class was 84.9%


End of year (May 2025):

  • 100% of her students were reading at or above grade level on iReady (+63%)
  • Median of 184% of typical growth for iReady
    • The average DIBELS wpm for the class was 108.2 (+58.6wpm)
      • EOY Benchmark for 1st grade is 91 wpm
    • The average accuracy was 98.1% (+13.2%)
      • EOY 1st grade benchmark for accuracy is 91%.
  • Every student was independently reading chapter books by year’s end.

DIBELS Results 8th Edition – Correct Words Per Minute and Percent Accuracy

In Her Own Words

In September 2025, Bolton shared this reflection on her experience with EBLI:

"EBLI has completely transformed the way I teach and the way my students learn. During my first year using EBLI, every child in my class experienced remarkable growth. Struggling readers made leaps that once felt out of reach, while fluent readers progressed far beyond grade-level expectations. One thing that makes EBLI so powerful is its seamless integration of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, handwriting, writing, and spelling. These skills aren't taught in isolation. Instead, they are woven together in every EBLI activity, giving students constant practice with high-leverage skills. Built on cognitive science, EBLI instruction feels clear and efficient. It reduces the cognitive load for both students and teachers so we can focus on what truly matters. In my classroom, EBLI is everywhere! Reading and writing flow naturally through every subject, and the activities are so engaging that students often beg to do them as rewards. I've watched my first graders grow into resilient, flexible thinkers who genuinely love learning and reading! EBLI has given me more than a method…it has given me a mission! My passion to join EBLI in 'teaching the world to read' now stretches beyond my classroom of students. I've started tutoring during planning times at school and even opened a private practice over the summer to reach more learners. Teaching with EBLI doesn't just feel like instruction; it feels like a calling, because every person deserves the richness of a literate life."
Stephane Bolton
First Grade Teacher, Kilby Laboratory School

Who Is Stephane Bolton?

Stephane is the first-grade supervising teacher at Kilby Laboratory School, a public laboratory school on the campus of the University of North Alabama in Florence, Alabama. Kilby is ranked among the top 5% of elementary schools in Alabama for overall test scores, with 80–84% of students achieving reading proficiency — compared to the state average of 47%.

Accomplishments: 

Two articles about her EBLI experience published in peer-reviewed journals: 

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Founded Primary Patchwork Learning Center, 2025

  • Stephane teaches EBLI privately to students after school, on weekends, and during the summer.

Goyen Literacy Fellow, 2025

Presenter (by request), Alabama Literacy Association conference, Fall, 2025

  • Follow the Yellow Brick Road: A Speech-to-Print Journey to Stronger Literacy

Featured Holly Korbey’s “The Phonics Wars” article, February 2026

Why This Matters

Bolton’s story matters because she is not a newcomer. She had decades of training in teaching reading, Science of Reading frameworks, and evidence-based practices before she found EBLI. She had already been doing the work. And yet, it was the shift to Linguistic Phonics — the speech-first, streamlined approach that EBLI uses — that closed the gap for the students she hadn’t been able to reach before.

Her experience mirrors what EBLI’s independent research has shown across larger studies: in a Michigan study of 815 students across 35 classrooms, 58% of K–4 students met fall-to-fall growth expectations with EBLI, compared to 42% in the pre-EBLI cohort. In a Massachusetts intervention study, 37% of students reached grade level and 88% passed the state assessment. And in Grand Rapids, the percentage of students at or above grade level rose from 40% to 70%.

Bolton’s classroom data adds a powerful individual case to this growing body of evidence — one teacher, one classroom, and the outcome every educator hopes for: every student reading.

Want to learn more about EBLI training? Explore Training Options 

See the full research behind EBLI: View Evidence

 
  • Bolton, S., Tomlinson, A., Kirkman, E. (2025) Elevating Literacy Through Evidence-Based Practice: A Case Study in Innovation at Kilby Laborators School, IALS Journal. Read the Journal. 
  • Bolton, S. (2025) Teaching with Clarity: The Power of Speech-to-Print Instruction, The Reading Paradigm (2025). Read the article
  • Bolton, S. (2025). Teaching less and learning more: Five shifts that maximized growth. Science of Reading Classroom. Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “A Closer Look at EBLI: Bringing the Five Shifts to Life.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “Fluency in 1st Grade: An Introduction.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Korbey, H. (2026). “The Phonics Wars.” The Bell Ringer (Substack). Read the article
  • EBLI Facebook page, sharing Bolton’s data from the 2024–2025 school year
  • Goyen Literacy Fellowship. Goyen Foundation. Learn more
  • ESSA Research on EBLI, independent efficacy studies. See results

Share this post

Recent Blogs

1 Comment

  • Listening to the video and reading the different articles was most enlightening. Thank you for sharing information so that I can meet the needs of my students as issues arise throughout the EBLI process.

Comments are closed.

×