April-5-image-pmu1jl4yoy1tcfvgu82l2qvcg1m4tr4zfmmva7w3go

Plea from a Former Balanced Literacy Teacher: Can We Let Go of Classroom Practices that Aren’t Working

“Teachers the world over are experiencing increasing awareness about the research that backs how reading should be taught – often referred to as the Science of Reading – and are shifting or completely changing their teaching practices as a result. Julie VanLier is a 21-year veteran Kindergarten Teacher who has undergone extensive self-education on the reading research and dramatically changed her reading, spelling, and writing instruction as a result. I would like to enthusiastically welcome Julie, a dedicated, determined, exceptional EBLI teacher, as our first guest blogger.” – Nora Chahbazi

The following guest blog and accompanying video were written and recorded by Kindergarten Teacher Julie VanLier (pictured here):

Michigan Teacher Defies Odds

My journey into structured literacy began in August 2019. A few years prior, I moved from a highly affluent school to a high poverty school (in the same district), and my Acadience scores plummeted.  Through a series of fortunate events, I attended an EBLI training, paying for it with my own money. I left the workshop overwhelmed and full of doubt. EBLI went against EVERYTHING I had learned from my college classes, the educational books I read, and the professional development in my district.

Because EBLI didn’t align with my educational beliefs, I ignored it. I had been taught that it is developmentally easier for kindergartners to write capital letters rather than lowercase ones. That we should first teach kids to read environmental print (ie, McDonald’s arches for “McDonalds”) to boost their confidence. That we need to spend months teaching rhyming, compound words, and syllables.

When I finally got around to teaching EBLI (though I disguised it in our schedule chart so my principal wouldn’t know I was using a different curriculum), I was astonished. My kiddos were blending words together to read and segmenting words to write – and it was only the end of September! I typically hadn’t taught those phonemic awareness skills until January! I had zero behavior problems during the 45 minute lessons, and everyone was engaged. This is highly unusual for a classroom full of 26 four and five year olds! At first, I taught EBLI for my phonics lessons, but the rest of my Language Arts block remained the same: I sent my kids off to “read” during reading workshop, “write” during writing workshop, and then I “reinforced” those concepts during centers. It was almost as though I were trying to drive with one foot on the brake and one foot on the gas pedal: Explicitly teaching kids how to read and write during phonics but then I’d send them off to construct their own knowledge during workshop time. I’m sure this sent kids conflicting messages: “During writing time, guess how to spell a word, but during phonics say each sound and write the correct spelling for that sound”. This made no sense!

As teachers, we need to do a better job of using our critical thinking skills when planning and teaching. First, our curriculum and teaching methods need to be research aligned instead of based on personal beliefs. Although cognitive scientists figured out decades ago how the brain learns to read, teachers still cling tightly to their own beliefs. I would NEVER choose a doctor who practiced medicine using debunked methods, so why is this actually encouraged in education?

Second, teachers need to stop being the “guide on the side”. There is nothing natural about learning to read and write. It took civilization thousands of years to create our alphabet system yet we believe that kids can figure it out by themselves in two to three years. We need to deliver explicit, systematic instruction and stop thinking that our students will reach grade level standards by being turned loose to construct their own knowledge.

Third, we need to quit wasting instructional time. What will students truly learn from doing all those seat work activities from Teachers Pay Teachers? Or the countless “learning” songs on You Tube? The National Reading Panel says there are five pillars to effective reading instruction: phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. We have too much to do (and don’t forget math, science, and social studies) to fill our day with useless activities that don’t accelerate learning.

There is a saying, “you don’t know what you don’t know.” But, once you realize that YOU are the one who is causing kids to fail, then it is time for you to be gutsy enough to say no to outdated practices and say yes to embracing practices that teach all kids to be proficient readers and writers.

Stephane Bolton has spent more than two decades teaching first graders to read. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, a Master’s degree, and an Education Specialist degree — all from the University of North Alabama. In 2011, she received National Board Certification and renewed it in 2020. She has served as an instructional coach and an assistant principal. By any measure, Stephane was already an accomplished literacy educator.

But she wasn’t reaching every student.

Bolton had trained extensively in phonics instruction over the years — first through the Alabama Reading Initiative, then through LETRS and Orton-Gillingham. Each step forward clarified the picture. As she told journalist Holly Korbey in The Bell Ringer, the Science of Reading training helped her see the puzzle pieces more clearly, and things began to make more sense. But a handful of students continued to struggle, year after year.

Then she discovered EBLI.

The Shift

Bolton found EBLI through the Accelerate Literacy Summit — almost by accident. What caught her attention was how the method streamlined phonics instruction: fewer rules for students to memorize, a lighter cognitive load, and a focus on students picking up sound-letter patterns in words and applying them to reading and writing. It was a fundamentally different approach — Linguistic Phonics, rooted in the speech-to-print methodology that starts with what students already know (spoken language) and maps it to print.

She paid for the training herself.

The Results

What happened next in Stephane’s first-grade classroom during her first year teaching EBLI was remarkable.

2024–2025 School Year (Bolton’s First Year Using EBLI):

Beginning of year (August 2024): 

  • 37% of her class was at grade level on the iReady assessment.
  • The average wpm (words per minute) on DIBELS for the 19 students was 46.9.
  • The average accuracy on DIBELS for the class was 84.9%


End of year (May 2025):

  • 100% of her students were reading at or above grade level on iReady (+63%)
  • Median of 184% of typical growth for iReady
    • The average DIBELS wpm for the class was 108.2 (+58.6wpm)
      • EOY Benchmark for 1st grade is 91 wpm
    • The average accuracy was 98.1% (+13.2%)
      • EOY 1st grade benchmark for accuracy is 91%.
  • Every student was independently reading chapter books by year’s end.

DIBELS Results 8th Edition – Correct Words Per Minute and Percent Accuracy

In Her Own Words

In September 2025, Bolton shared this reflection on her experience with EBLI:

"EBLI has completely transformed the way I teach and the way my students learn. During my first year using EBLI, every child in my class experienced remarkable growth. Struggling readers made leaps that once felt out of reach, while fluent readers progressed far beyond grade-level expectations. One thing that makes EBLI so powerful is its seamless integration of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, handwriting, writing, and spelling. These skills aren't taught in isolation. Instead, they are woven together in every EBLI activity, giving students constant practice with high-leverage skills. Built on cognitive science, EBLI instruction feels clear and efficient. It reduces the cognitive load for both students and teachers so we can focus on what truly matters. In my classroom, EBLI is everywhere! Reading and writing flow naturally through every subject, and the activities are so engaging that students often beg to do them as rewards. I've watched my first graders grow into resilient, flexible thinkers who genuinely love learning and reading! EBLI has given me more than a method…it has given me a mission! My passion to join EBLI in 'teaching the world to read' now stretches beyond my classroom of students. I've started tutoring during planning times at school and even opened a private practice over the summer to reach more learners. Teaching with EBLI doesn't just feel like instruction; it feels like a calling, because every person deserves the richness of a literate life."
Stephane Bolton
First Grade Teacher, Kilby Laboratory School

Who Is Stephane Bolton?

Stephane is the first-grade supervising teacher at Kilby Laboratory School, a public laboratory school on the campus of the University of North Alabama in Florence, Alabama. Kilby is ranked among the top 5% of elementary schools in Alabama for overall test scores, with 80–84% of students achieving reading proficiency — compared to the state average of 47%.

Accomplishments: 

Two articles about her EBLI experience published in peer-reviewed journals: 

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Founded Primary Patchwork Learning Center, 2025

  • Stephane teaches EBLI privately to students after school, on weekends, and during the summer.

Goyen Literacy Fellow, 2025

Presenter (by request), Alabama Literacy Association conference, Fall, 2025

  • Follow the Yellow Brick Road: A Speech-to-Print Journey to Stronger Literacy

Featured Holly Korbey’s “The Phonics Wars” article, February 2026

Why This Matters

Bolton’s story matters because she is not a newcomer. She had decades of training in teaching reading, Science of Reading frameworks, and evidence-based practices before she found EBLI. She had already been doing the work. And yet, it was the shift to Linguistic Phonics — the speech-first, streamlined approach that EBLI uses — that closed the gap for the students she hadn’t been able to reach before.

Her experience mirrors what EBLI’s independent research has shown across larger studies: in a Michigan study of 815 students across 35 classrooms, 58% of K–4 students met fall-to-fall growth expectations with EBLI, compared to 42% in the pre-EBLI cohort. In a Massachusetts intervention study, 37% of students reached grade level and 88% passed the state assessment. And in Grand Rapids, the percentage of students at or above grade level rose from 40% to 70%.

Bolton’s classroom data adds a powerful individual case to this growing body of evidence — one teacher, one classroom, and the outcome every educator hopes for: every student reading.

Want to learn more about EBLI training? Explore Training Options 

See the full research behind EBLI: View Evidence

 
  • Bolton, S., Tomlinson, A., Kirkman, E. (2025) Elevating Literacy Through Evidence-Based Practice: A Case Study in Innovation at Kilby Laborators School, IALS Journal. Read the Journal. 
  • Bolton, S. (2025) Teaching with Clarity: The Power of Speech-to-Print Instruction, The Reading Paradigm (2025). Read the article
  • Bolton, S. (2025). Teaching less and learning more: Five shifts that maximized growth. Science of Reading Classroom. Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “A Closer Look at EBLI: Bringing the Five Shifts to Life.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “Fluency in 1st Grade: An Introduction.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Korbey, H. (2026). “The Phonics Wars.” The Bell Ringer (Substack). Read the article
  • EBLI Facebook page, sharing Bolton’s data from the 2024–2025 school year
  • Goyen Literacy Fellowship. Goyen Foundation. Learn more
  • ESSA Research on EBLI, independent efficacy studies. See results

Share this post

Recent Blogs

×