good-grades-image-p2j4zrla57pvvlzt5wvkyxz9pj9o4w2k2f3wf5lwg8

Pretend Reading: How does a child get good grades but read poorly?

How Might I Identify A Pretend Reader (and Speller)?

In our reading center, parents often ask us how their child got all A’s on their report card but really can’t read or write.

My daughter Colleen was the best reader in her class in 1st grade and the beginning of 2nd grade, according to her teachers. She was fluent and accurate, sounding like a beautiful reader when reading books taught in class. She also got 100% on every spelling test.

In reality, she was a poor reader and a horrific speller.

IDENTIFYING PRETEND READING

In 2nd grade, Colleen tested a year below grade level on the reading portion of the Iowa test (but in the 98th percentile in math – well above grade level). She could not read any book or story she hadn’t already memorized and couldn’t even accurately read a sentence pulled out from a book or story she had memorized.

In her classroom, the audiotape of the story was read to the class, then the teacher read it to the class, then the students spent the week reading the story. Colleen thought looking at the ceiling while ‘reading’ the story was a great trick.

Colleen was a pretend reader. She could recite books from memory but she couldn’t actually read the words. She was a ‘rote memory’ speller. She could memorize the words for a spelling test but she couldn’t spell the same words in her writing. Are you familiar with children like this?

A more common strategy ‘pretend readers’ use is to look at the picture to figure out what might be written on the page but say words that aren’t on the page (‘bunny’ for ‘rabbit’ or ‘little’ for ‘small’). Pretend readers often look at the first letter of a word then guess, saying a different word that starts with the same letter (‘stop’ for ‘spot’ or ‘pretty’ for ‘print’). It is very common for pretend readers to misread the connecting words that occur frequently in text (and’ instead of said’ or ‘when instead of went).

Typically, the pretend readers misspell words in writing even more than they misread words when reading. Reading and spelling are two sides of the same coin, using the same code, but spelling is much more challenging. Sometimes a child will do well on spelling tests if they can memorize the string of letter names for the word, but then misspell the same words from the test when writing. They often spell phonetically, writing ‘skul’ for ‘school’ or ‘wuz’ for ‘was’.

Pretend readers may comprehend the text, especially in early grades when using simple pattern books. In these books, most or all the words repeat on each page except for one. There is a picture to represent the word that is changed so the child can look at the picture to figure out what the word is instead of reading it. If a student has re-read the story or book many times and has memorized it – like Colleen did – they will comprehend the information.

However, most pretend readers do not understand what they read. If they are not reading the words written on the page, then comprehending what they read is not possible. For example, if they say “I saw a beautiful butterfly” but the words on the page are “I saw a bouncing basketball,” they will assume the sentence is about a butterfly, not a basketball. As students move past K and 1st grade, they have more trouble reading the words accurately and getting the gist of the text. Third grade is most commonly when struggles accelerate significantly with both reading and spelling.  

How Do Students Become Pretend Readers and Spellers?

Children go to school expecting to magically become readers and writers. Teachers and parents are eager for children to quickly begin reading and writing. Often that enthusiasm results in deemphasizing or avoiding instruction in the foundational skills, concepts, and information needed to accurately decode/decipher words and encode/spell words. Learning to read and spell in order to become proficient readers and writers requires significant effort. Commonly this instruction and effort is bypassed in hopes of students arriving more quickly at comprehension and writing. While that may appear to work somewhat in the short term, it will backfire for the majority of students in the long run. 

Getting to the end goal of reading (understanding what you’ve read) can be compared to the process of getting to the end goal of driving a car or living in a house: there are components that must be in place before you can have the pleasure of the finished product. If the car doesn’t have an engine or the house doesn’t have a foundation, the exterior may look lovely, but you’d have a worthless car or an unstable house.

The same is true for reading as well as spelling. The ‘engine’ or ‘foundation’ of reading is matching the letters in the words on the page to the sounds that those letters represent in speech. For example, when a reader sees the word was, they need to accurately match the sounds to the letter(s) – /w/ (spelled with a ‘w’), /u/ (spelled with an ‘a’), and /z/ (spelled with an ‘s’) – and then blend the sounds into a word.

After using this process to decode a specific word a few times, the word can then be read automatically without the need of sounding it out. This is the ‘engine’ or ‘foundation’ of reading.  Over time the alphabetic code is learned, from simple to complex, through explicit instruction and then helping a student apply what was learned as they read and write. 

For spelling, the inverse is true: there is a blank page that requires writing down the letter(s) that represent the sounds in the words. When spelling phone, a learner must know that the /f/ sound is represented with ‘ph’, the /oa/ sound is represented with ‘o’, and the /n/ sound is represented with ‘ne’. Spelling is a much more daunting task and takes longer to master than reading! You may know (or be) a good reader who is a poor speller, but you will be hard pressed to find a good speller who is a poor reader.

The English alphabetic code used for reading and writing is extremely complex. An understanding of this code is imperative in order to establish a firm foundation for reading and spelling.

For pretend readers and spellers, this foundation is weak or missing altogether. They don’t have any idea that reading is based on the English alphabetic code and rarely have they been shown the logic of the code or how to apply it. I’ll delve deeply into the concepts and logic of that code in our March 2021 blogs and webinar on How to Teach Reading Well and Quickly.

Children (or adults) who have a weak understanding or knowledge of this code fall back on ineffective strategies they’ve figured out or been taught in an attempt to muddle through reading and writing. As they get older, the complexity of the text they are expected to read (or write) increases. There are no more pictures to rely on to try to figure out the words and there are too many words to memorize or try to guess. The effort required to manage increasingly difficult text engulfs and overwhelms these learners as they fall further behind each school year. Comprehension becomes more and more compromised; spelling and writing become increasingly impossible.

How Do I Know if a Child is Pretend Reading or Spelling?

If you want to check and see if a child is pretend reading versus really reading, give them an unfamiliar book that is appropriate for their age or ability level. Ask them to read it to you. If there are pictures in the book, cover the pictures. Pay attention to their accuracy in reading the words and how they approach unfamiliar words. 

To check their spelling, ask them to write you a sentence to a paragraph, depending on their age and ability level. Note the accuracy – or inaccuracy – of their spelling, punctuation, and capitalization as well as handwriting.

How Do Students Become Accurate Readers and Writers?

The cure for sub-literacy – reading, writing, and spelling below one’s potential – is not just instruction but instruction that works. Explicit, effective, efficient instruction in the essential components of reading (phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension), and writing (spelling, handwriting, and writing composition), based on the Science of Reading, is imperative. This instruction must start with the foundation, which is the logic and application of the skills, concepts, and information to manage the English alphabetic code. It must be intertwined with explicit instruction in all the components of literacy. Ideally, learners will utilize and apply what they’ve been taught via supported reading in text and spelling in writing. Receiving feedback and error corrections as needed is another crucial component on the student’s journey to becoming an accurate, automatic, high level reader and writer.

Abolishing ineffective, inefficient habits that hinder reading and writing is also necessary. Practice in guessing words, looking at the picture, over-reliance on rules, using inventive spelling, and writing without punctuation, capitalization, or conventions quickly become engrained habits and inhibit accurate reading and spelling. Register for our Pretend Reading webinar to learn some techniques on how to help students get rid of these habits.

Reading words in text accurately and automatically as well as spelling and writing accurately are the building blocks that lead to high level literacy for all.

Have you seen pretend reading in action with your student(s)? What are you doing to combat pretend reading? Share in the comments.

Stephane Bolton has spent more than two decades teaching first graders to read. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, a Master’s degree, and an Education Specialist degree — all from the University of North Alabama. In 2011, she received National Board Certification and renewed it in 2020. She has served as an instructional coach and an assistant principal. By any measure, Stephane was already an accomplished literacy educator.

But she wasn’t reaching every student.

Bolton had trained extensively in phonics instruction over the years — first through the Alabama Reading Initiative, then through LETRS and Orton-Gillingham. Each step forward clarified the picture. As she told journalist Holly Korbey in The Bell Ringer, the Science of Reading training helped her see the puzzle pieces more clearly, and things began to make more sense. But a handful of students continued to struggle, year after year.

Then she discovered EBLI.

The Shift

Bolton found EBLI through the Accelerate Literacy Summit — almost by accident. What caught her attention was how the method streamlined phonics instruction: fewer rules for students to memorize, a lighter cognitive load, and a focus on students picking up sound-letter patterns in words and applying them to reading and writing. It was a fundamentally different approach — Linguistic Phonics, rooted in the speech-to-print methodology that starts with what students already know (spoken language) and maps it to print.

She paid for the training herself.

The Results

What happened next in Stephane’s first-grade classroom during her first year teaching EBLI was remarkable.

2024–2025 School Year (Bolton’s First Year Using EBLI):

Beginning of year (August 2024): 

  • 37% of her class was at grade level on the iReady assessment.
  • The average wpm (words per minute) on DIBELS for the 19 students was 46.9.
  • The average accuracy on DIBELS for the class was 84.9%


End of year (May 2025):

  • 100% of her students were reading at or above grade level on iReady (+63%)
  • Median of 184% of typical growth for iReady
    • The average DIBELS wpm for the class was 108.2 (+58.6wpm)
      • EOY Benchmark for 1st grade is 91 wpm
    • The average accuracy was 98.1% (+13.2%)
      • EOY 1st grade benchmark for accuracy is 91%.
  • Every student was independently reading chapter books by year’s end.

DIBELS Results 8th Edition – Correct Words Per Minute and Percent Accuracy

In Her Own Words

In September 2025, Bolton shared this reflection on her experience with EBLI:

"EBLI has completely transformed the way I teach and the way my students learn. During my first year using EBLI, every child in my class experienced remarkable growth. Struggling readers made leaps that once felt out of reach, while fluent readers progressed far beyond grade-level expectations. One thing that makes EBLI so powerful is its seamless integration of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, handwriting, writing, and spelling. These skills aren't taught in isolation. Instead, they are woven together in every EBLI activity, giving students constant practice with high-leverage skills. Built on cognitive science, EBLI instruction feels clear and efficient. It reduces the cognitive load for both students and teachers so we can focus on what truly matters. In my classroom, EBLI is everywhere! Reading and writing flow naturally through every subject, and the activities are so engaging that students often beg to do them as rewards. I've watched my first graders grow into resilient, flexible thinkers who genuinely love learning and reading! EBLI has given me more than a method…it has given me a mission! My passion to join EBLI in 'teaching the world to read' now stretches beyond my classroom of students. I've started tutoring during planning times at school and even opened a private practice over the summer to reach more learners. Teaching with EBLI doesn't just feel like instruction; it feels like a calling, because every person deserves the richness of a literate life."
Stephane Bolton
First Grade Teacher, Kilby Laboratory School

Who Is Stephane Bolton?

Stephane is the first-grade supervising teacher at Kilby Laboratory School, a public laboratory school on the campus of the University of North Alabama in Florence, Alabama. Kilby is ranked among the top 5% of elementary schools in Alabama for overall test scores, with 80–84% of students achieving reading proficiency — compared to the state average of 47%.

Accomplishments: 

Two articles about her EBLI experience published in peer-reviewed journals: 

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Founded Primary Patchwork Learning Center, 2025

  • Stephane teaches EBLI privately to students after school, on weekends, and during the summer.

Goyen Literacy Fellow, 2025

Presenter (by request), Alabama Literacy Association conference, Fall, 2025

  • Follow the Yellow Brick Road: A Speech-to-Print Journey to Stronger Literacy

Featured Holly Korbey’s “The Phonics Wars” article, February 2026

Why This Matters

Bolton’s story matters because she is not a newcomer. She had decades of training in teaching reading, Science of Reading frameworks, and evidence-based practices before she found EBLI. She had already been doing the work. And yet, it was the shift to Linguistic Phonics — the speech-first, streamlined approach that EBLI uses — that closed the gap for the students she hadn’t been able to reach before.

Her experience mirrors what EBLI’s independent research has shown across larger studies: in a Michigan study of 815 students across 35 classrooms, 58% of K–4 students met fall-to-fall growth expectations with EBLI, compared to 42% in the pre-EBLI cohort. In a Massachusetts intervention study, 37% of students reached grade level and 88% passed the state assessment. And in Grand Rapids, the percentage of students at or above grade level rose from 40% to 70%.

Bolton’s classroom data adds a powerful individual case to this growing body of evidence — one teacher, one classroom, and the outcome every educator hopes for: every student reading.

Want to learn more about EBLI training? Explore Training Options 

See the full research behind EBLI: View Evidence

 
  • Bolton, S., Tomlinson, A., Kirkman, E. (2025) Elevating Literacy Through Evidence-Based Practice: A Case Study in Innovation at Kilby Laborators School, IALS Journal. Read the Journal. 
  • Bolton, S. (2025) Teaching with Clarity: The Power of Speech-to-Print Instruction, The Reading Paradigm (2025). Read the article
  • Bolton, S. (2025). Teaching less and learning more: Five shifts that maximized growth. Science of Reading Classroom. Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “A Closer Look at EBLI: Bringing the Five Shifts to Life.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “Fluency in 1st Grade: An Introduction.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Korbey, H. (2026). “The Phonics Wars.” The Bell Ringer (Substack). Read the article
  • EBLI Facebook page, sharing Bolton’s data from the 2024–2025 school year
  • Goyen Literacy Fellowship. Goyen Foundation. Learn more
  • ESSA Research on EBLI, independent efficacy studies. See results

Share this post

Recent Blogs

×