EBLI-Accurate-Spelling-Accelerate-Reading-puvg3ihmqzrkyus8kwczn5tgfdjnd7t2ti5w24xs3s

Spelling and EBLI – Accelerate Reading with Accurate Spelling

Research says a lot about the importance of spelling as well as the connection between spelling and reading and writing.

Here are just a few research references about the importance of spelling:

‘The spelling to read movement spotlights the importance of spelling for orthographic mapping and spelling’s role in automatic word reading which drives reading comprehension.’

Why Spelling Instruction Should be Hot in 2022-2023, Psychology Today

‘The truth is that learning to read, write, and spell all help reinforce each other. Moreover, learning to spell enhances reading, writing, and literacy skills for young children in elementary school.’

How Spelling Affects Reading and Writing, IMSE Journal

‘The present study examined the possibility that spelling fulfils a self-teaching function in the acquisition of orthographic knowledge because, like decoding, it requires close attention to letter order and identity as well as to word-specific spelling–sound mapping.’

Spelling as a self-teaching mechanism in orthographic learning, Wiley Online Library

‘The author builds a partly theoretical, partly empirical case for the claim that learning to read and learning to spell are one and the same, almost. She concludes that they are one and the same because they depend on the same knowledge sources in memory: knowledge about the alphabetic system and knowledge about the spellings of specific words. She concludes that reading and spelling are not quite the same because the response performed to read words differs from the response performed to spell words. The act of reading involves one response, that of pronouncing a word. In contrast, the act of spelling involves multiple responses, that of writing several letters in the correct sequence.’

Learning to Read and Learning to Spell are One in the Same, Almost , APA PsychNet

With EBLI, our focus is on transferring this research to accurate, automatic spelling in the classroom (and beyond) in the most effective, efficient manner possible.

This blog is an overview of how we accelerate instruction and the companion Spelling and EBLI webinar will explore this topic more in-depth. The follow – up Spelling Workshop will provide you with applicable strategies and activities to improve spelling for learners of all ages and ability levels.

 

When my daughter, Colleen, was in 2nd grade in 1997, she appeared to be a great speller on spelling tests, but this did not transfer to spelling in writing, often misspelling the same words she’d previously spelled correctly on spelling tests. In some circumstances, she appeared to be an above average speller (and reader). In truth, she was below or well below grade level and her potential in both areas.

Here are examples of her 2nd grade work.

Colleen’s 2nd Grade Spelling Test

Colleen-Spelling-Test

Colleen’s 2nd Grade Writing

Colleen-2nd-grade-story-before-EBLI

Why was there such a significant discrepancy between her spelling on the test and spelling in her writing?

Spelling for a test is often an assessment of rote memory ability of strings of letters. We worked with her for hours every week to memorize those strings of letters and she held onto it until she regurgitated it for the test. Often she couldn’t spell those same words by the time she got home that afternoon. She did not have a strategy to spell.

Spelling requires accessing the sounds in words through segmenting and using the acceptable spellings for those sounds. Colleen had an idea of the sounds in words as she had been taught traditional phonics (Abeka) in Kindergarten. However, she had no idea how to spell them correctly but instead used her ‘Kindergarten spellings’ (the most common spelling for each sound) instead of the accurate spelling. In her writing, you see this by her spelling was as ‘wus’, there as ‘thar’, and called as ‘cold’. Even though she got some difficult words correct on her test (delicious…?!), she got very simple words incorrect in her writing.

With instruction based on sound first, Colleen learned to read very quickly. She was reading chapter books accurately after just hours of instruction. However, her spelling lagged behind reading, as is typical. For her, it was much more of a process to correct. It took about 2 years for her spelling to become consistently accurate in her writing. Because her spelling was corrected only at home and rarely at school, this was a more drawn out process. Research shows that seeing misspelled words results in decreased spelling ability. As Diane McGuinness laments in her book Early Reading Instruction, ‘Fix spelling! Seeing misspelled words results in worse spelling.’ (pg 117)

Teaching and correcting spelling not only benefits spelling but also benefits accurate word reading, comprehension, and writing. Quadruple the benefits! Hopefully, spelling instruction by sound and providing effective, efficient, student-involved corrections will soon become the norm.

Spelling is a code, and every code is reversible. Decoding, or reading the words, is receptive as the reader deciphers the word off the page. When explicitly taught how the English alphabetic code works, this is quickly done automatically and subconsciously through the process of orthographic mapping.  Encoding, or spelling by writing letters that represent the sounds in words, is expressive. The learner is looking at a blank page and has to retrieve the correct or acceptable spelling. This is more difficult because it requires simultaneous processing (or doing several things at once) which increases the cognitive load or brain work. Also, there are many ways to spell almost every sound in English so knowledge of the code is needed. The more a learner accurately spells words in writing and accurately reads words in connected text, the more their brain will pick up the concepts and spelling patterns unique to English, and the more they will better recognize the correct spellings to use.   

Improve spelling, and you will improve reading even faster! Accessing the sound, not the letter name, is key to accurate, automatic spelling. To spell (or read) ‘was’, whole word memorization is largely ineffective and letter names can cause confusion. Speech is natural so teaching both reading and spelling originating from spoken words speeds up all literacy instruction. In order to teach reading and spelling from spoken words, we must access the sounds then say the sounds as we write the spelling (letter(s)) that represents those sounds. When spelling starts from print or the letter name, we are leading with a man-made visual process that makes spelling, and reading, more complex and confusing.

Teaching spelling by sound can circumvent students making mistakes that result from using letter names and avoid extended periods of time misspelling words without corrective assistance. When a learner misreads or guesses words without corrective feedback, they become a chronic guesser and that habit takes a lot of instruction and support to reverse. The same is true when a learner misspells words without corrective feedback. It takes even more time to remediate and reverse the ineffective habit of inventive spelling.

Spelling is important. It is how we communicate with others when we are not able to speak to them. Poor spellers avoid writing and, when they do write, it is difficult for others to decipher their error-riddled text. Other areas of literacy are hindered too.

Teach your students or children how to spell by sound. Show them the correct spelling for errors and have THEM correct it. As with handwriting, spelling is a critical component of literacy. It needs and deserves explicit instruction and attention.

For a deeper dive into what was discussed here with examples shared to elaborate on the information shared, check out this Spelling and EBLI webinar. Also, as a new offering, I will be teaching an online workshop on the process to teach spelling words, correct spelling in writing, and strengthen weak areas in spelling for your class, intervention students, or children. Click here for more information.

Stephane Bolton has spent more than two decades teaching first graders to read. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, a Master’s degree, and an Education Specialist degree — all from the University of North Alabama. In 2011, she received National Board Certification and renewed it in 2020. She has served as an instructional coach and an assistant principal. By any measure, Stephane was already an accomplished literacy educator.

But she wasn’t reaching every student.

Bolton had trained extensively in phonics instruction over the years — first through the Alabama Reading Initiative, then through LETRS and Orton-Gillingham. Each step forward clarified the picture. As she told journalist Holly Korbey in The Bell Ringer, the Science of Reading training helped her see the puzzle pieces more clearly, and things began to make more sense. But a handful of students continued to struggle, year after year.

Then she discovered EBLI.

The Shift

Bolton found EBLI through the Accelerate Literacy Summit — almost by accident. What caught her attention was how the method streamlined phonics instruction: fewer rules for students to memorize, a lighter cognitive load, and a focus on students picking up sound-letter patterns in words and applying them to reading and writing. It was a fundamentally different approach — Linguistic Phonics, rooted in the speech-to-print methodology that starts with what students already know (spoken language) and maps it to print.

She paid for the training herself.

The Results

What happened next in Stephane’s first-grade classroom during her first year teaching EBLI was remarkable.

2024–2025 School Year (Bolton’s First Year Using EBLI):

Beginning of year (August 2024): 

  • 37% of her class was at grade level on the iReady assessment.
  • The average wpm (words per minute) on DIBELS for the 19 students was 46.9.
  • The average accuracy on DIBELS for the class was 84.9%


End of year (May 2025):

  • 100% of her students were reading at or above grade level on iReady (+63%)
  • Median of 184% of typical growth for iReady
    • The average DIBELS wpm for the class was 108.2 (+58.6wpm)
      • EOY Benchmark for 1st grade is 91 wpm
    • The average accuracy was 98.1% (+13.2%)
      • EOY 1st grade benchmark for accuracy is 91%.
  • Every student was independently reading chapter books by year’s end.

DIBELS Results 8th Edition – Correct Words Per Minute and Percent Accuracy

In Her Own Words

In September 2025, Bolton shared this reflection on her experience with EBLI:

"EBLI has completely transformed the way I teach and the way my students learn. During my first year using EBLI, every child in my class experienced remarkable growth. Struggling readers made leaps that once felt out of reach, while fluent readers progressed far beyond grade-level expectations. One thing that makes EBLI so powerful is its seamless integration of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, handwriting, writing, and spelling. These skills aren't taught in isolation. Instead, they are woven together in every EBLI activity, giving students constant practice with high-leverage skills. Built on cognitive science, EBLI instruction feels clear and efficient. It reduces the cognitive load for both students and teachers so we can focus on what truly matters. In my classroom, EBLI is everywhere! Reading and writing flow naturally through every subject, and the activities are so engaging that students often beg to do them as rewards. I've watched my first graders grow into resilient, flexible thinkers who genuinely love learning and reading! EBLI has given me more than a method…it has given me a mission! My passion to join EBLI in 'teaching the world to read' now stretches beyond my classroom of students. I've started tutoring during planning times at school and even opened a private practice over the summer to reach more learners. Teaching with EBLI doesn't just feel like instruction; it feels like a calling, because every person deserves the richness of a literate life."
Stephane Bolton
First Grade Teacher, Kilby Laboratory School

Who Is Stephane Bolton?

Stephane is the first-grade supervising teacher at Kilby Laboratory School, a public laboratory school on the campus of the University of North Alabama in Florence, Alabama. Kilby is ranked among the top 5% of elementary schools in Alabama for overall test scores, with 80–84% of students achieving reading proficiency — compared to the state average of 47%.

Accomplishments: 

Two articles about her EBLI experience published in peer-reviewed journals: 

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Founded Primary Patchwork Learning Center, 2025

  • Stephane teaches EBLI privately to students after school, on weekends, and during the summer.

Goyen Literacy Fellow, 2025

Presenter (by request), Alabama Literacy Association conference, Fall, 2025

  • Follow the Yellow Brick Road: A Speech-to-Print Journey to Stronger Literacy

Featured Holly Korbey’s “The Phonics Wars” article, February 2026

Why This Matters

Bolton’s story matters because she is not a newcomer. She had decades of training in teaching reading, Science of Reading frameworks, and evidence-based practices before she found EBLI. She had already been doing the work. And yet, it was the shift to Linguistic Phonics — the speech-first, streamlined approach that EBLI uses — that closed the gap for the students she hadn’t been able to reach before.

Her experience mirrors what EBLI’s independent research has shown across larger studies: in a Michigan study of 815 students across 35 classrooms, 58% of K–4 students met fall-to-fall growth expectations with EBLI, compared to 42% in the pre-EBLI cohort. In a Massachusetts intervention study, 37% of students reached grade level and 88% passed the state assessment. And in Grand Rapids, the percentage of students at or above grade level rose from 40% to 70%.

Bolton’s classroom data adds a powerful individual case to this growing body of evidence — one teacher, one classroom, and the outcome every educator hopes for: every student reading.

Want to learn more about EBLI training? Explore Training Options 

See the full research behind EBLI: View Evidence

 
  • Bolton, S., Tomlinson, A., Kirkman, E. (2025) Elevating Literacy Through Evidence-Based Practice: A Case Study in Innovation at Kilby Laborators School, IALS Journal. Read the Journal. 
  • Bolton, S. (2025) Teaching with Clarity: The Power of Speech-to-Print Instruction, The Reading Paradigm (2025). Read the article
  • Bolton, S. (2025). Teaching less and learning more: Five shifts that maximized growth. Science of Reading Classroom. Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “A Closer Look at EBLI: Bringing the Five Shifts to Life.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “Fluency in 1st Grade: An Introduction.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Korbey, H. (2026). “The Phonics Wars.” The Bell Ringer (Substack). Read the article
  • EBLI Facebook page, sharing Bolton’s data from the 2024–2025 school year
  • Goyen Literacy Fellowship. Goyen Foundation. Learn more
  • ESSA Research on EBLI, independent efficacy studies. See results

Share this post

Recent Blogs

×