March-16-image-p3jzizv5oz10zcux5vgtjkt1vlthqc0u4v0vekgb60

The Foundation that Leads to Great Reading – PART 2

Part 2:  Accelerate Instruction

As we established in Part 1 of this blog series, English is an alphabetic code. The skills needed to manage this code and the concepts that are unique to the code are covered in Part 1. If you haven’t read it yet, I recommend doing so. You may find it helpful to give you context before delving into the information below.

FOUNDATION FOR GREAT READING –
ACCELERATE INSTRUCTION

Decoding (reading) is utilized to read words and encoding (spelling) is used to spell words. These processes are often taught in a variety of ways, depending on the program or system that is used to teach the code.

Sometimes phonics (matching the sounds we say to the letter(s) that represent them) is taught with explicit instruction in a systematic way and other times it is taught incidentally, thrown in here and there with worksheets and/or when a student is reading and writing. Phonics can be taught print to speech (letters to sounds). In this process, students are shown graphemes or letter(s) and taught what sound or grapheme goes with the letter(s). On the flip side of this, instruction can be speech to print (sounds to letters). This process of instruction requires students to pay attention first to the sounds or phonemes they hear and then, as a second step, to match the letter(s) or graphemes to those sounds.  

While teaching the code speech to print (accessing the sounds first, before attaching the letters that spell the sound) is less common, the research has shown this process is more effective and efficient. Instruction that focuses on accessing the sound first (speech) then matching it with the letter(s) that represent the sound (print) is reversible, allowing reading and spelling to be taught simultaneously. Examples of what this looks like in practice is easier to show than tell;  it is shared to a degree in the video above and more extensively in the Foundational Reading Instruction webinar

Below, there are a dozen practices we teach and use as well as why we do them. These practices, based on our experiences and those of the thousands of teachers we train, serve to accelerate student acquisition of the code as well as progress in other areas of reading instruction. Many of these suggestions might be unfamiliar and reading them may feel uncomfortable, especially for educators. Elaboration through hearing them discussed and seeing examples in action rather than reading them on a page can help with integrating the information (so be sure to sign up for the webinar!).   

Wondering about the “why” behind these practices? Click Here for a 2-page document with the research-based reasoning behind each practice (also listed below)!

To keep or share the graphic above, you may save it to your device or click here for a PDF version.

1. Teach the sound first, instead of teaching the letter name first.

  • We access the sound to read, not the name of the letter.
    • You can be an excellent reader and not know any consonant letter names.
  • Every consonant letter name is at least 2 sounds.
    • ‘b’ = /b/ /ee/
    • ‘c’ = /s/ /ee/
    • ‘f’ = /e/ /f/
    • ‘h’= /ay/ /ch/
    • ‘w’= /d/ /u/ /b/ /l/ /y/ /oo/

2. Look at the text, not the pictures, to read the words.

  • Looking at pictures when reading takes focus away from the words and almost always leads to guessing/misreading the words.
  • Reading is talk written down. The person who wrote the text is communicating with the person who is reading it.
  • Text for 3rd grade and older rarely has pictures in it.

3. Read all the sounds in the word, left to right. Do not just read the first sound.

  • ALL sounds in a word are important, not just the first sound.
  • Many students have received the implication – or are explicitly taught – that the first letter is somehow the only one that really matters.
  • This often leads to them guessing the word, inserting a word that starts with that letter but isn’t the word that is written.

4. Sound out unfamiliar words; don’t guess or memorize.

  • Rarely is the guessed word the word that is written on the page.
  • Misreading words leads to poor comprehension.
  • As children move up in grades, there are more words in their reading vocabulary.
    • By about 3rd grade, their memory is saturated and their misreading of words increases dramatically.
    • Because of this, struggling readers past 3rd grade and into adulthood are typically reading at about a 3rd grade level.

5. Students should track under the words smoothly with their finger rather than tapping.

  • Finger gliding under words when reading increases fluency/reading speed.
  • Tapping under each word slows down fluency/reading speed.

6. Teach tendencies or patterns instead of rules.

  • There are many tendencies in the syllable and sound/spelling patterns in words.
    • Some tendencies happen more frequently than others.
    • None of the tendencies happen all the time.
  • Teaching rules takes significant instructional time.
  • Learning and integrating rules requires a huge amount of memory and brain work.
  • Many students are confused by inconsistent rules.

7. Interleave (mix, alternate between) instruction as opposed to teaching to mastery.

  • Teaching several skills and concepts is preferable to focusing just on one and teaching it to mastery and moving on to something else.
  • Teaching explicitly and reviewing and revisiting the skills, concepts, and information previously taught will better lead to mastery over time.
  • “It is more effective to distribute practice across different skills than polish each one in turn.” – make it stick: The Science of Successful Learning, pg. 65
  • “Interleaving and variation help learners reach beyond memorization to higher levels of conceptual learning and application.” make it stick: The Science of Successful Learning, pg. 65

8. Scaffold writing instruction and correct misspelled words in writing.

  • Practicing doing something incorrectly and repeatedly (misspelling), without feedback on how to fix it, results in getting very good at doing it incorrectly.
    • It is much more challenging to teach a child to spell correctly once they have repeatedly misspelled words without correction than it is to teach them in the first place.
  • “When learners commit errors and are given corrective feedback, the errors are not learned.” make it stick: The Science of Successful Learning, pg. 90
    • Meaning: When a child misspells words, show them the correction so they can then spell the words correctly.

9. Teach the correct way to form letters and correct errors in handwriting.

  • Learning correct handwriting (top to bottom, left to right) can enhance learning of spelling, vocabulary, and composition skills.
  • Handwriting production with verbal prompts (not tracing!) will improve attention, motor skills, muscle memory, and handwriting fluency.
  • With EBLI, we use the Peterson Handwriting prompts.

10. Teach the code, as well as blending and segmenting, within the context of words (not in isolation).

  • Instruction moves faster.
  • When instruction is within words and moves to reading in text and writing, students understand why they are learning what you are teaching them.
  • Using words instead of teaching sounds and spellings in isolation makes the instruction meaningful and relevant.

11. Teach speech to print.

  • It is more effective and efficient.
  • It is reversible, working well for both reading and spelling.

12. Read out loud to students, using a novel that is above the ability level of your highest reader.

  • This is important for all students but even more so for emerging and struggling readers.
  • This provides all students with exposure to background knowledge, higher level vocabulary, and the sequence and flow of a story.

Some of these suggestions may have felt a bit jarring to you. That’s ok! When solving a problem with the magnitude of moving literacy proficiency from 35% to 95-100% in our country, we must look at doing things differently than we have done them in the past. If we don’t change our actions as educators and parents, we won’t positively change the outcomes for the children we teach and raise. 

The most important questions to ask yourself when teaching or supporting a reader or writer, especially if they are not highly proficient in these areas, are these:

  1. Why am I doing what I’m doing?
    • Ideally, the answer should be because it is helping your child or student advance their literacy.
  2. Is what I’m doing resulting in increased proficiency in reading, spelling, and writing for my student(s) or child(ren)?
    • If the answer is no, search out what you need to do differently.

To delve deeper into this topic, I hope you are able to take advantage of the webinar focused on the information in both this blog and Part 1 of the series!

Please comment with your insights, questions, or additional effective, efficient practices that you’ve used when teaching and/or supporting children to become highly proficient in reading, spelling, and writing.

Stephane Bolton has spent more than two decades teaching first graders to read. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, a Master’s degree, and an Education Specialist degree — all from the University of North Alabama. In 2011, she received National Board Certification and renewed it in 2020. She has served as an instructional coach and an assistant principal. By any measure, Stephane was already an accomplished literacy educator.

But she wasn’t reaching every student.

Bolton had trained extensively in phonics instruction over the years — first through the Alabama Reading Initiative, then through LETRS and Orton-Gillingham. Each step forward clarified the picture. As she told journalist Holly Korbey in The Bell Ringer, the Science of Reading training helped her see the puzzle pieces more clearly, and things began to make more sense. But a handful of students continued to struggle, year after year.

Then she discovered EBLI.

The Shift

Bolton found EBLI through the Accelerate Literacy Summit — almost by accident. What caught her attention was how the method streamlined phonics instruction: fewer rules for students to memorize, a lighter cognitive load, and a focus on students picking up sound-letter patterns in words and applying them to reading and writing. It was a fundamentally different approach — Linguistic Phonics, rooted in the speech-to-print methodology that starts with what students already know (spoken language) and maps it to print.

She paid for the training herself.

The Results

What happened next in Stephane’s first-grade classroom during her first year teaching EBLI was remarkable.

2024–2025 School Year (Bolton’s First Year Using EBLI):

Beginning of year (August 2024): 

  • 37% of her class was at grade level on the iReady assessment.
  • The average wpm (words per minute) on DIBELS for the 19 students was 46.9.
  • The average accuracy on DIBELS for the class was 84.9%


End of year (May 2025):

  • 100% of her students were reading at or above grade level on iReady (+63%)
  • Median of 184% of typical growth for iReady
    • The average DIBELS wpm for the class was 108.2 (+58.6wpm)
      • EOY Benchmark for 1st grade is 91 wpm
    • The average accuracy was 98.1% (+13.2%)
      • EOY 1st grade benchmark for accuracy is 91%.
  • Every student was independently reading chapter books by year’s end.

DIBELS Results 8th Edition – Correct Words Per Minute and Percent Accuracy

In Her Own Words

In September 2025, Bolton shared this reflection on her experience with EBLI:

"EBLI has completely transformed the way I teach and the way my students learn. During my first year using EBLI, every child in my class experienced remarkable growth. Struggling readers made leaps that once felt out of reach, while fluent readers progressed far beyond grade-level expectations. One thing that makes EBLI so powerful is its seamless integration of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, handwriting, writing, and spelling. These skills aren't taught in isolation. Instead, they are woven together in every EBLI activity, giving students constant practice with high-leverage skills. Built on cognitive science, EBLI instruction feels clear and efficient. It reduces the cognitive load for both students and teachers so we can focus on what truly matters. In my classroom, EBLI is everywhere! Reading and writing flow naturally through every subject, and the activities are so engaging that students often beg to do them as rewards. I've watched my first graders grow into resilient, flexible thinkers who genuinely love learning and reading! EBLI has given me more than a method…it has given me a mission! My passion to join EBLI in 'teaching the world to read' now stretches beyond my classroom of students. I've started tutoring during planning times at school and even opened a private practice over the summer to reach more learners. Teaching with EBLI doesn't just feel like instruction; it feels like a calling, because every person deserves the richness of a literate life."
Stephane Bolton
First Grade Teacher, Kilby Laboratory School

Who Is Stephane Bolton?

Stephane is the first-grade supervising teacher at Kilby Laboratory School, a public laboratory school on the campus of the University of North Alabama in Florence, Alabama. Kilby is ranked among the top 5% of elementary schools in Alabama for overall test scores, with 80–84% of students achieving reading proficiency — compared to the state average of 47%.

Accomplishments: 

Two articles about her EBLI experience published in peer-reviewed journals: 

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Founded Primary Patchwork Learning Center, 2025

  • Stephane teaches EBLI privately to students after school, on weekends, and during the summer.

Goyen Literacy Fellow, 2025

Presenter (by request), Alabama Literacy Association conference, Fall, 2025

  • Follow the Yellow Brick Road: A Speech-to-Print Journey to Stronger Literacy

Featured Holly Korbey’s “The Phonics Wars” article, February 2026

Why This Matters

Bolton’s story matters because she is not a newcomer. She had decades of training in teaching reading, Science of Reading frameworks, and evidence-based practices before she found EBLI. She had already been doing the work. And yet, it was the shift to Linguistic Phonics — the speech-first, streamlined approach that EBLI uses — that closed the gap for the students she hadn’t been able to reach before.

Her experience mirrors what EBLI’s independent research has shown across larger studies: in a Michigan study of 815 students across 35 classrooms, 58% of K–4 students met fall-to-fall growth expectations with EBLI, compared to 42% in the pre-EBLI cohort. In a Massachusetts intervention study, 37% of students reached grade level and 88% passed the state assessment. And in Grand Rapids, the percentage of students at or above grade level rose from 40% to 70%.

Bolton’s classroom data adds a powerful individual case to this growing body of evidence — one teacher, one classroom, and the outcome every educator hopes for: every student reading.

Want to learn more about EBLI training? Explore Training Options 

See the full research behind EBLI: View Evidence

 
  • Bolton, S., Tomlinson, A., Kirkman, E. (2025) Elevating Literacy Through Evidence-Based Practice: A Case Study in Innovation at Kilby Laborators School, IALS Journal. Read the Journal. 
  • Bolton, S. (2025) Teaching with Clarity: The Power of Speech-to-Print Instruction, The Reading Paradigm (2025). Read the article
  • Bolton, S. (2025). Teaching less and learning more: Five shifts that maximized growth. Science of Reading Classroom. Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “A Closer Look at EBLI: Bringing the Five Shifts to Life.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “Fluency in 1st Grade: An Introduction.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Korbey, H. (2026). “The Phonics Wars.” The Bell Ringer (Substack). Read the article
  • EBLI Facebook page, sharing Bolton’s data from the 2024–2025 school year
  • Goyen Literacy Fellowship. Goyen Foundation. Learn more
  • ESSA Research on EBLI, independent efficacy studies. See results

Share this post

Recent Blogs

×