Foundation-to-Great-Reading-p2vi1tok9spigx27ljao9tzzw4l0fuj488sphpjjwo

The Foundation that Leads to Great Reading – PART 1

This is Part 1 of a 2-part blog series. Once you’re done, be sure to check out Part 2!

Part 1: Skills and Concepts

There is a lot of debate in education circles about what reading is or isn’t, and around the term Science of Reading. This discourse can be drawn out and take up a lot of valuable time that could be better utilized elsewhere. Namely, educating and supporting teachers on how to most effectively and efficiently teach literacy and teaching children to become highly proficient readers, writers, and spellers.

FOUNDATION FOR GREAT READING – SKILLS & CONCEPTS

What is not up for debate is that the reading and spelling of words is based on the English alphabetic code, or phonics. This code is the foundation for reading and spelling. For decades, the Science of Reading – in education, cognitive psychology, linguistics, and neuro-science – has strongly supported explicit instruction in this code.  As with building a house, reading and writing consist of many components. However, having a firm foundation is imperative to the success of creating both a solid house and a highly proficient, accurate reader. The complex process of reading and writing is a man-made phenomenon. It is not natural for humans. In order to become highly adept at reading and writing, the English code must be taught in order for the foundation to be firmly set in place. Once that foundation is solid, and even as it is being solidified in students, it can be built upon with all the other facets that make up reading and writing. These include, but are not limited to, background knowledge, vocabulary, phonemic awareness, handwriting, fluency, spelling, and comprehension.

The focus of this blog is instruction in the code or phonics: matching the sounds we say to the letter(s) that represent them.

Think of various codes you have learned or heard about. As I child, I loved the codes on the back of cereal boxes. For example, a triangle = ‘p’, a diamond = ‘t’, and a rectangle = ‘a’. With this code, an image of a diamond, followed by a rectangle, followed by a triangle would represent the word ‘tap’ – simple.

Conversely, the CIA and war communications use complex codes. For example, the Navajo Indians supplied code talkers to send and receive messages during WWII. This code was so complex it was one of the few codes used during the war that was never broken. The movie Navajo Code Talkers of WWII depicts this story.  

The Spanish and Italian languages are made up of simple codes which are easy to learn. Italian children learn the simple code easily and quickly, in a matter of weeks. There are 21 letters, or symbols, and each represents one sound. This is similar to the cereal box code and is easy to decipher.

Conversely, the English language is made up of a complex code and is more challenging to learn. If this code is not explicitly taught, the majority of learners will not understand it or be able to apply it to effectively and efficiently read or spell. A small percentage of learners do figure the code out on their own to a degree, though rarely to their highest potential. Most are baffled by this code, as you and I would be by the Navajo code.

You may be wondering – why is the English code so complex? The core reason is that English spellings are borrowed from several other languages. Because of this, there are some concepts – along with the English alphabetic code – that need to be taught, practiced, and understood in order for someone to manage the code proficiently. The very good news is that there is a system of logic that simplifies the acquisition and application of this code! While this system of logic is rarely taught to students (or their teachers), the other good news is that this situation can be rectified by the explicit teaching and training of educators, who then explicitly teach it to their students. Because learning to read is a multi-faceted cognitive process that requires significant brain work, and because the code is complex, both learning and teaching it requires time and effort.

Following are concepts of the English code; understanding these concepts along with explicitly learning the code will accelerate the journey to accurate, automatic reading and spelling. This lays a solid foundation that leads to more easily acquiring the other components of literacy.  

To keep or share the graphic above, you may save it to your device or click here for a PDF version.

The phonemic awareness skills of blending sounds together, pulling sounds apart, and moving sounds around in words are also imperative in order to optimally utilize the English alphabetic code for reading and spelling.

Teaching these concepts and skills, along with explicitly teaching the English code, will provide students with the foundation to accurately read and spell words. Accurate word reading is the foundation upon which other tasks leading to comprehension and higher level thinking are built. Accurately spelling is the foundation that provides the support that leads to great writing. 

Samuel Johnson is credited for creating the first dictionary in England back in the mid-1700s. Thanks to the complexity of the English alphabetic code, it took him and a team of scholars over 8 years to complete the task. Typically, we are asking 5 and 6 year olds in our schools to figure out this code largely on their own. Early in their school career – often within the first weeks – they are expected to read books, with little to no explicit instruction in this complex code. It is a near impossible task!

Conversely, teachers are tasked to get their students reading proficiently without themselves having been given training or instruction on how to teach this complex code. All around, this is an unfair situation and is much of the reason that only 65% of 4th graders in the United States are proficient in reading.

Research shows unequivocally what we need to do to teach the foundational skills, concepts, and information to students so they are able accurately and automatically read and spell words. Teachers need to know how to effectively and efficiently teach this. Students need to be able to learn this in order to become highly literate. All of us interested in high level literacy for all are tasked to put the debating in the background and do whatever is necessary to get teachers and students what they need.  

In Part 2 of this blog series, I’ll share some dos and don’ts that will help accelerate the teaching of the English alphabetic code/phonics. If you are interested in learning more, click HERE for our free webinar.

Have you seen a student confused by the complexity of the English code? If so, how were you equipped to provide support? Share in the comments.

This is Part 1 of a 2-part blog series. Once you’re done, be sure to check out Part 2!

Stephane Bolton has spent more than two decades teaching first graders to read. She holds a Bachelor’s degree in elementary education, a Master’s degree, and an Education Specialist degree — all from the University of North Alabama. In 2011, she received National Board Certification and renewed it in 2020. She has served as an instructional coach and an assistant principal. By any measure, Stephane was already an accomplished literacy educator.

But she wasn’t reaching every student.

Bolton had trained extensively in phonics instruction over the years — first through the Alabama Reading Initiative, then through LETRS and Orton-Gillingham. Each step forward clarified the picture. As she told journalist Holly Korbey in The Bell Ringer, the Science of Reading training helped her see the puzzle pieces more clearly, and things began to make more sense. But a handful of students continued to struggle, year after year.

Then she discovered EBLI.

The Shift

Bolton found EBLI through the Accelerate Literacy Summit — almost by accident. What caught her attention was how the method streamlined phonics instruction: fewer rules for students to memorize, a lighter cognitive load, and a focus on students picking up sound-letter patterns in words and applying them to reading and writing. It was a fundamentally different approach — Linguistic Phonics, rooted in the speech-to-print methodology that starts with what students already know (spoken language) and maps it to print.

She paid for the training herself.

The Results

What happened next in Stephane’s first-grade classroom during her first year teaching EBLI was remarkable.

2024–2025 School Year (Bolton’s First Year Using EBLI):

Beginning of year (August 2024): 

  • 37% of her class was at grade level on the iReady assessment.
  • The average wpm (words per minute) on DIBELS for the 19 students was 46.9.
  • The average accuracy on DIBELS for the class was 84.9%


End of year (May 2025):

  • 100% of her students were reading at or above grade level on iReady (+63%)
  • Median of 184% of typical growth for iReady
    • The average DIBELS wpm for the class was 108.2 (+58.6wpm)
      • EOY Benchmark for 1st grade is 91 wpm
    • The average accuracy was 98.1% (+13.2%)
      • EOY 1st grade benchmark for accuracy is 91%.
  • Every student was independently reading chapter books by year’s end.

DIBELS Results 8th Edition – Correct Words Per Minute and Percent Accuracy

In Her Own Words

In September 2025, Bolton shared this reflection on her experience with EBLI:

"EBLI has completely transformed the way I teach and the way my students learn. During my first year using EBLI, every child in my class experienced remarkable growth. Struggling readers made leaps that once felt out of reach, while fluent readers progressed far beyond grade-level expectations. One thing that makes EBLI so powerful is its seamless integration of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, handwriting, writing, and spelling. These skills aren't taught in isolation. Instead, they are woven together in every EBLI activity, giving students constant practice with high-leverage skills. Built on cognitive science, EBLI instruction feels clear and efficient. It reduces the cognitive load for both students and teachers so we can focus on what truly matters. In my classroom, EBLI is everywhere! Reading and writing flow naturally through every subject, and the activities are so engaging that students often beg to do them as rewards. I've watched my first graders grow into resilient, flexible thinkers who genuinely love learning and reading! EBLI has given me more than a method…it has given me a mission! My passion to join EBLI in 'teaching the world to read' now stretches beyond my classroom of students. I've started tutoring during planning times at school and even opened a private practice over the summer to reach more learners. Teaching with EBLI doesn't just feel like instruction; it feels like a calling, because every person deserves the richness of a literate life."
Stephane Bolton
First Grade Teacher, Kilby Laboratory School

Who Is Stephane Bolton?

Stephane is the first-grade supervising teacher at Kilby Laboratory School, a public laboratory school on the campus of the University of North Alabama in Florence, Alabama. Kilby is ranked among the top 5% of elementary schools in Alabama for overall test scores, with 80–84% of students achieving reading proficiency — compared to the state average of 47%.

Accomplishments: 

Two articles about her EBLI experience published in peer-reviewed journals: 

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Recipient of ALA Outstanding Literacy Teacher Award, 2025

Founded Primary Patchwork Learning Center, 2025

  • Stephane teaches EBLI privately to students after school, on weekends, and during the summer.

Goyen Literacy Fellow, 2025

Presenter (by request), Alabama Literacy Association conference, Fall, 2025

  • Follow the Yellow Brick Road: A Speech-to-Print Journey to Stronger Literacy

Featured Holly Korbey’s “The Phonics Wars” article, February 2026

Why This Matters

Bolton’s story matters because she is not a newcomer. She had decades of training in teaching reading, Science of Reading frameworks, and evidence-based practices before she found EBLI. She had already been doing the work. And yet, it was the shift to Linguistic Phonics — the speech-first, streamlined approach that EBLI uses — that closed the gap for the students she hadn’t been able to reach before.

Her experience mirrors what EBLI’s independent research has shown across larger studies: in a Michigan study of 815 students across 35 classrooms, 58% of K–4 students met fall-to-fall growth expectations with EBLI, compared to 42% in the pre-EBLI cohort. In a Massachusetts intervention study, 37% of students reached grade level and 88% passed the state assessment. And in Grand Rapids, the percentage of students at or above grade level rose from 40% to 70%.

Bolton’s classroom data adds a powerful individual case to this growing body of evidence — one teacher, one classroom, and the outcome every educator hopes for: every student reading.

Want to learn more about EBLI training? Explore Training Options 

See the full research behind EBLI: View Evidence

 
  • Bolton, S., Tomlinson, A., Kirkman, E. (2025) Elevating Literacy Through Evidence-Based Practice: A Case Study in Innovation at Kilby Laborators School, IALS Journal. Read the Journal. 
  • Bolton, S. (2025) Teaching with Clarity: The Power of Speech-to-Print Instruction, The Reading Paradigm (2025). Read the article
  • Bolton, S. (2025). Teaching less and learning more: Five shifts that maximized growth. Science of Reading Classroom. Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “A Closer Look at EBLI: Bringing the Five Shifts to Life.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Bolton, S. (2025). “Fluency in 1st Grade: An Introduction.” Science of Reading Classroom (Substack). Read the post
  • Korbey, H. (2026). “The Phonics Wars.” The Bell Ringer (Substack). Read the article
  • EBLI Facebook page, sharing Bolton’s data from the 2024–2025 school year
  • Goyen Literacy Fellowship. Goyen Foundation. Learn more
  • ESSA Research on EBLI, independent efficacy studies. See results

Share this post

Recent Blogs

×